
Friday, February 13, 2026
Understanding Rejection Sensitive Dysphoria: How This App Can Help
For many with ADHD, a simple "no" can feel like a world-ending nightmare. This is Rejection Sensitive Dysphoria (RSD), and it makes navigating daily life painfully hard.
Developed by clinical psychologists, Inflow helps you understand and navigate RSD triggers using science-backed strategies.
In just 5 minutes a day, you can learn to prevent unhelpful thoughts and build deep emotional resilience. Stop spiraling and start reframing your thinking with a custom learning plan designed for your brain.
Life is already too short. Don't let ugly souls ruin the beauty in yours.
There’s a particular kind of harm that doesn’t leave bruises. It leaves you second-guessing your tone, editing your joy, and shrinking your honest reactions until you can’t remember what felt natural in the first place. It often arrives through ordinary interactions—a comment that turns your good news into something suspect, a conversation that always ends with you feeling slightly ashamed, a pattern of sarcasm that masquerades as “just being real.”
The quote doesn’t ask you to become hardened. It asks you to become discerning.
“Ugly souls” isn’t a diagnosis. It’s a shorthand for a certain posture toward life: delight in conflict, comfort in contempt, a habit of turning other people into targets. Some people live from that posture without even noticing it. Others wield it deliberately. Either way, the effect is similar: you leave the room less yourself.
Most of us don’t intend to let that happen. We want to be fair. We want to be kind. We want to give people the benefit of the doubt. But intention doesn’t always protect impact. When you repeatedly absorb someone else’s bitterness, your nervous system learns to expect it. You become vigilant. You start preparing for the next jab instead of staying present for the moment in front of you. Over time, “not taking it personally” becomes a performance—quietly expensive, quietly exhausting.
Protecting your inner life doesn’t require a dramatic exit. It can look like choosing shorter conversations. Not offering vulnerable information to someone who uses it as leverage. Not explaining yourself to someone committed to misunderstanding you. It can mean noticing which relationships require you to recover afterward—and taking that data seriously.
There’s a difference between being open-hearted and being unguarded. An open heart is generous with warmth, but it’s also honest about conditions. It knows that closeness is earned through care, not claimed through familiarity or obligation. When you start treating your attention like something valuable, you stop handing it to people who handle it roughly.
This isn’t about labeling others as villains so you can feel superior. It’s about noticing what happens to you in their presence. Do you speak more softly, not from tenderness, but from fear of reaction? Do you feel compelled to prove your worth? Do you lose your sense of proportion—one comment echoing for days? Your life is already short. You don’t need to volunteer your beauty as a casualty.
Sometimes the most mature response isn’t forgiveness or confrontation. It’s distance. Not punitive distance—protective distance. The kind that lets you return to yourself without needing to be rescued from the residue of someone else’s unresolved darkness.
Origin & Context
Because the author is unknown, the most useful context is the tradition the quote belongs to: a long line of moral psychology and practical wisdom that treats attention as a finite resource and emotional boundaries as a form of stewardship. Across stoic thought, modern psychotherapy, and everyday ethical teaching, a consistent idea appears—your inner life is shaped by what you repeatedly expose yourself to.

The language here is direct and vernacular, suggesting it was written less as philosophy and more as a protective reminder—something you might tell a friend after watching them dim themselves in the presence of someone corrosive. It carries the tone of lived experience: the realization that you can’t argue someone into tenderness, and you can’t love someone into being safe.
An “unknown” attribution often points to how universally the insight lands. It doesn’t need a famous name to be true. It survives because people recognize the pattern: certain influences don’t merely challenge you—they distort you. This quote gives permission to treat that distortion as a legitimate reason to choose space, silence, or limits.
Why This Still Matters Today
Modern life makes it easier to stay in contact with people who unsettle you. You can be reached instantly, pulled into threads, group chats, and comment wars that you didn’t ask for. You can also be quietly compared, criticized, or baited in ways that feel “small” but accumulate.
Technology intensifies exposure while lowering the cost of cruelty. A careless remark used to end when the conversation ended; now it can replay on a screen, get shared, or linger as a notification you never wanted. This is why boundaries matter more now: the door to your attention is rarely closed by default. If you don’t choose what gets in, something else will.
Curated Resource List
Books
Boundaries — Henry Cloud & John Townsend
Set Boundaries, Find Peace — Nedra Glover Tawwab
The Gift of Fear — Gavin de Becker
Crucial Conversations — Kerry Patterson, Joseph Grenny, Ron McMillan, Al Switzler
Research / Organizations
American Psychological Association (APA) — resources on stress, relationships, and well-being
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) — foundational mental health education
Talks / Thinkers
Brené Brown — work on boundaries, vulnerability, and values
Viktor E. Frankl — meaning, agency, and inner freedom (especially through Man’s Search for Meaning)
Reflection Prompts
Which interactions leave you feeling smaller afterward—not challenged in a good way, but subtly diminished? What is the recurring pattern?
Where have you been calling “endurance” what is actually self-abandonment? What are you afraid would happen if you set a limit?
What parts of yourself do you hide around certain people (joy, ambition, tenderness, confidence)? Why those parts specifically?
If your attention were a budget, who consistently overspends it? What would a sustainable “spending limit” look like?
Closing Insight
Not everyone deserves access to your most tender parts. Beauty isn’t naïveté—it’s something you learn to protect, quietly and without apology.



